일 | 월 | 화 | 수 | 목 | 금 | 토 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
- 서평
- 주간주식현황
- 연금ETF
- 아마존닷컴
- 염승환부장
- 염블리
- 현대모비스
- 주린이탈출
- 현대차우
- 주식투자
- 배당주투자
- 롯데리츠
- 가치투자
- 흙수저탈출기
- 마이크로소프트
- 제일제당
- 염승환
- 현대차배당금
- 삼성전자
- 공인중개사
- 고배당주
- 주린이
- 삼성전자우
- 주린이탈출기
- 주린이가가장알고싶은최다질문TOP77
- 주식공부
- CJ제일제당
- ETF투자
- 기아배당금
- ETF
- Today
- Total
흙수저탈출기
01. Should smoking in public places be banned? 본문
Some countries, such as Singapore and the UK, have already introduced legislation which imposes a ban on smoking in workplaces and other public places. Other counries are considering such a ban and this given rise to much controversy among the population of these countries.
My view is that everyone has a right to work in a comfortable, clean, healthy environment and should not have to put up with other people's nicotine habit. Smoking is a very antisocial habit which, at the very least, can cause discomfort to others in the form of a smoky atmosphere and dirty surroundings caused by dropped cigarette ash on the floor, overflowing ashtrays and discarded cigarette ends.
Smokers also endanger the health of others. If people want to ignore the dangers and go on smoking, despite the known dangers, then that is their choice. However, it is now known that the inhalation of cigarette smoke by non-smokers, known as passive smoking, can lead to various health problems in the same way that smoking can. It is unjust that smokers should be allowed to have a deleterious effect on the health of their workmates.
Protesters against a smoking ban in the workplace claim that such a ban is contrary to the human rights of smokers, but smokers are, in fact, infringing the human rights of their colleagues by endangering their health and polluting their environment.
Smokers also complain that they have to go outside the building to smoke in all weather conditions. Thery also claim that smoking outside a building makes them look and feel like pariahs. However, that is the price they have to pay for persisting in indulging in such an antisocial habit.
The same no-smoking rule should apply to public places such as government offices, libraries, sport complexes and airports. People often have no choice but to go into such buildings and they have a right to have their health and comfort safeguarded from the habits of others. Most airlines ban smoking and smokers have to resist the temptation to light up during the course of the flight. Why should they not demonstrate the same level of self-control in public building?
The question of imposing a ban on smoking in public places of entertainment has caused the most controversy. Restaurant owners, publicans and brewers are vehemently opposed to it beacuse they say that it will affect their livelihood and smokers say that it will affect their enjoyment of an evening out. Non-smokers, they say, need not to go into a smoky pub or resturant.
However, these places of entertainment are also workplaces and the waiter, barpersons and other service personnel should not have to put their health at risk by being subjected to cigarette smoke. In the light of this, Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York has already announced a smoking ban in restaurants and pubs and Ireland has followed suit. I hope that many other countries will follow their example and impose a no-smoking ban in all public places.
'ENGLISH ESSAYS' 카테고리의 다른 글
02. Why people are living longer (0) | 2021.01.13 |
---|